|
The pulp mill dispute was a dispute between Argentina and Uruguay concerning the construction of pulp mills on the Uruguay River. The presidents at the time were Néstor Kirchner (Argentina) and Tabaré Vázquez (Uruguay). As a diplomatic, economic, and public relations conflict between both parties, the dispute has also affected tourism and transportation as well as the otherwise amicable relations between the two countries. The feud was unprecedented between the two countries, which have shared historical and cultural ties.〔("Argentine blockade irks neighbours" )〕 Proceedings were brought before the International Court of Justice as a case formally named Pulp Mills on the River Uruguay ''(Argentina v. Uruguay)''.〔(International Court of Justice docket: Pulp Mills on the River Uruguay ''(Argentina v. Uruguay)'' )〕 It ruled that, although Uruguay failed to inform Argentina of the operations, it did not pollute the river, so closing the pulp mill would be unjustified. The conflict ended in 2010, during the presidencies of Cristina Fernández de Kirchner (Argentina) and José Mujica (Uruguay), with the establishment of a joint coordination of the activities in the river. ==Origin of the dispute== After twenty years of forest industry development, in October 2003, the Spanish company ENCE,〔(【引用サイトリンク】 Web del Grupo Empresarial ENCE )〕 received permission from the Uruguayan government to build a pulp mill in Fray Bentos, on the Uruguay River (which forms the natural border north between Brazil and Argentina and in the south between Uruguay and Argentina). Argentinians residing mainly in Gualeguaychú, Entre Ríos, about 35 km from Fray Bentos, had been claiming that ENCE's pulp mill would pollute the river. Also, some demonstrations had been organized against ENCE. After ENCE received its permit, another company, the Finnish Botnia,〔(【引用サイトリンク】 Welcome to Botnia! )〕 made public their intention to consider the same area for another pulp mill. Botnia received the environmental authorization to build a mill in February 2005. The Uruguay River is shared by the two countries and is protected by a treaty, which requires both parties to inform the other of any project that might affect the river. Besides the issue of pollution, Argentina claimed that the Uruguayan government had not asked for permission to build the mills. Uruguayan authorities counter that the Treaty does not require that permission be obtained, but merely that the other part be appropriately informed, and that conversations had indeed been held and filed, without objections on the Argentinian part. In addition, they claim that the technology used in the mills would avoid polluting the river to the extent claimed by Argentinians. Furthermore, Botnia argues the mill has a positive impact on the river's waters as the factory's state-of-the-art wastewater treatment equipment is used for local sewage treatment as well. Before the construction of the mill, sewage from the city of Fray Bentos was discharged to the river untreated. Botnia's claims are backed by neutral expert statements given to the IFC.〔Botnia willing to contribute in improving the Rio Uruguay river water - Press release by Metsä-Botnia. ()〕 抄文引用元・出典: フリー百科事典『 ウィキペディア（Wikipedia）』 ■ウィキペディアで「Uruguay River pulp mill dispute」の詳細全文を読む スポンサード リンク
|